When we use willpower as a primary change strategy, we are basically fighting ourselves, acknowledging that something deep within us does not want to change and using sheer determination to overcome it.
To approach the challenge of personal development with objectivity and compassion, we need to understand what happens when we try to change. In ‘Immunity to Change. How To Overcome It and Unlock the Potential in Yourself and Your Organization’, Harvard Graduate School of Education professors Robert Kegan and Lisa Laskow Lahey address the question: “Why is personal change so difficult?”
Kegan and Lahey’s research suggests that the problem is not a failure of willpower. Rather, our difficulty in achieving our goals is more to do with an ‘emotional immune system’ that activates and protects us from the risks of change. Our real reason for subconsciously resisting or self-sabotaging our changes, their data suggests, is because the change threatens some other deeply held, competing commitment. They say, “We aren’t stupid. We are simply dedicated to honoring our commitments, just not the ones that we are conscious of.”
These competing commitments are mostly subconscious and linked to our image of ourselves as a particular kind of person. For example, if my self-image is committed to being ‘the one who helps’, then I might subconsciously resist accepting or asking for help from others. This means that any attempt to change my behaviour represents a threat to this self-image.
When facing an impossible conflict or tension between the perceived implications of the new behaviour and the demands of the self-image, our emotional immune system or defence mechanisms are activated to protect us and maintain the status quo.
For many people, holding two sets of competing commitments or beliefs is a paralysing experience. Many clients who report feeling stuck find that they are torn between two conflicting obligations and are unable to break the tie. For example, an Enneagram (Ennea) 7 client who is struggling with their health might be truly committed to getting healthy – but their underlying Ennea 7 commitment to not being restricted leads them to resist sticking to their rigid diet plan. Or an Ennea 2 might be committed to giving their children more independence, but find themselves pulled back in by their need to be needed, constantly breaking their resolve. The problem is that we're not always aware of this private, ongoing struggle.
Our Internal Conflict
The Enneagram is a powerful tool to help people whose efforts to change are hindered because it assesses and reveals our deepest, often unconscious commitments and beliefs that drive us. These hidden ‘competing commitments’ often come from the core needs and motivations of our Enneagram Type, and when we set a coaching or developmental goal that conflicts with these core needs, our ‘emotional immune system’ kicks in, activating our defence mechanisms to protect us – or rather, to protect our deep-seated hidden commitments.
This immunity to change arises when a proposed change – whether it is one imposed on us or a personal goal – brings up a conflict with our deep beliefs, linked to our Enneagram Type, about how we need to be in the world to be safe. This is one of the reasons why we emphasise ‘motivation, not behaviour’ in our work with the Enneagram – because our behaviour choices and potential to change are limited by our core motivations or commitments. Ennea 9s, for instance, are deeply committed to being peaceful and non-disruptive, avoiding conflict. This means that when they are asked to commit to a change that requires disruptive or more conflictual behaviours without proper support and coaching, they are likely to trigger an immunity to change. They could struggle to behave in different ways and be pulled back into old behaviours instead. The same can apply to any of the nine Types for reasons driven by the different ‘hidden commitments’ that are unique to each Type.
These competing commitments exist for an evolutionary purpose, to protect our sense of self and keep us from accidentally doing ourselves psychological harm. However, if they are allowed to become fixed and become immunities to change, they can also prevent us from learning, growing, and expressing ourselves as individuals. In the Enneagram world, this pattern of immunity to change is often referred to as ‘being fixated’, and, as we know, the Enneagram offers an antidote to this in the form of deep self-awareness.
Immunity to Change Process
Unpacking these deep fears and commitments can be a challenging journey, with our ‘immune system’ fighting us every step of the way. A partnership with an experienced coach can prove an invaluable guide as we integrate the Enneagram into a compassionate process of unlocking these stuck points. The Immunity to Change process suggests unpacking these stuck points through four steps:
- Step 1: Get goal-oriented. The first step is familiar to coaching – defining the goal. Identify the area that the client wants to focus on for a positive change, describe the desired change (or example ‘improve physical health’) and then list all the actions that will help to achieve that goal (for example, ‘eating three balanced meals per day’ or ‘working out twice a week’). This step is often completed in the first coaching session.
- Step 2: Clear obstructive behaviours. Ask the client “What’s stopping you from doing it now?” and identify the behaviours and barriers that are stalling their efforts. This step may become more relevant after a period of failed experimentation, and you may need to help clients identify their behaviours and blockers. For example, a barrier to the physical health challenge might be ‘forgetting to pack lunch’ or ‘being too busy to hit the gym’.
- Step 3: Confront competing commitments. Here’s where the real self-awareness journey begins. Looking at the behaviours listed in Step 2, ask your client to imagine themselves doing the exact opposite. Work with them to connect to and identify the feelings and concerns that this raises for them, and what they fear will be compromised. These are their limiting beliefs or competing commitments, likely to resonate with their Enneagram Type’s defences and fears.
- Step 4: Challenge big assumptions. Ask your client to name these limiting beliefs that need to be overcome to achieve change. Write down their fears: “If I do ____, then ____ will happen” and reflect with your client how this pattern is represented in their Enneagram profile. The Enneagram offers ways to compassionately challenge those assumptions; for example, by using the dilemma scissors technique to bring in other perspectives.
The process outlined above can open up a more constructive coaching conversation about the assumptions, core beliefs, and conflicts that underpin these Type-centric commitments, noticing how the commitment may actually be self-defeating and creating controlled experiments to test it.
The Story of Sam
In the story below, we briefly illustrate how subconscious beliefs can sabotage goals.
Sam is committed to becoming more of a team player, collaborating and sharing ideas with others more openly. However, despite participating in coaching and team development workshops, Sam keeps falling back into old behaviours such as interrupting others, disregarding their input, making decisions alone and acting independently, much to the team and Sam's frustration.
The coaching process asks Sam to visualise doing the exact opposite of those behaviours, then connect to the feelings and fears that come up. Sam's face changes. "Oh no! I'd never get ANYTHING finished. Working that way takes too long and slows me down. I won't be able to produce." Sam's commitment to being a better team player is subconsciously competing with a deep commitment to being fast, effective and maybe to avoid conflict and be able to do things as they please.
The assumption underpinning this competing commitment is that speed and productivity are the most important goals and that Sam will not be appreciated or valued if they slow down or fail to meet a deadline... characteristic, limiting beliefs of an Enneagram 3. Sam is then able to notice how this commitment to being the best is actually reflecting poorly – in a failure to work well within a team. In this way, the primary and competing commitments can become a paradox to be resolved, rather than a false choice.
Moving Towards Sustainable Change
While the Immunity to Change process makes it clear that real, sustained behaviour change may be even harder than expected, it also confirms the more reliable path for real transformation, aligned to the Enneagram integration journey. Instead of trying to modify our existing behaviours or practise new ones, we should be working deeper into our relationship with ourselves and identifying the beliefs and assumptions that are limiting us. Only then can we let go of some of our existing hidden commitments and drive sustainable, long-lasting change.
Kegan, R., and Laskow Lahey, L. (2009) “Immunity to Change. How to Overcome It and Unlock the Potential in Yourself and Your Organization.”